Harassment & Discrimination: September 2009 Archives

September 30, 2009

Riverside, California Jury Awards $26 Million on Age Discrimination Claim

A Riverside County Superior Court jury awarded $25 million in punitive damages to the nearly $1 million in compensatory damages they had awarded the previous day to a former Kmart manager for age discrimination. In the case of Harkins v. Kmart, the plaintiff alleged that Kmart's unlawful conduct was part of a sequence of events designed to get him to retire. Plaintiff had provided exceptional service to Kmart for 20 years, and claimed he was being terminated solely due to his age (64). He alleged that in the months before his termination, he was unlawfully demoted and disciplined in veiled attempts to "work on him" to quit or retire. When he did not "retire" or quit, he was fired. This firing, plaintiff alleged, was retaliatory due to his refusal to quit and due to his age.

1207444_courtroom_1.jpgMy Orange County Employment Law Firm was recently retained on a case where age discrimination was the primary claim. In assessing such cases, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between a company's need to reduce its work force due to budgetary concerns and a company using that reason as a pretext for its true motive, ridding itself of an "old" employee. Factors that tend to sway the scales in one direction or the other tend to be things like whether other job positions were eliminated, if other employees lost their jobs (and their ages in comparison to the rest of the workforce) and if the company intends on hiring (or has hired) new employees to replace or fill the holes left by the dismissed employees.

Bookmark and Share
September 21, 2009

California Wrongful Termination, What Does it Really Mean?


Almost all California employees are "at will" employees, meaning they can be terminated for any reason, so long as it is not an unlawful reason. So, if most employees are at will employees, what separates a termination from a wrongful termination?

California employees can essentially be terminated for any reason, so long as the reason is not an unlawful reason. Here are some of the more common unlawful reasons that would make a termination a wrongful termination:

  1. An employee may not be terminated for lawfully reporting sexual harassment to a supervisor or to Human Resources;
  2. Similar to above, an employee cannot be terminated for participating in an investigation of someone else's claims of sexual harassment or unlawful discrimination;
  3. For exposing certain unlawful wrongdoings by the company or by a higher ranking employee of the company, commonly known as whistle-blowing;
  4. For submitting a worker's compensation claim from injuries suffered at work;
  5. For complaining to management or Human Resources about not receiving proper wages, overtime compensation, lunch breaks or rest breaks;
  6. For filing a complaint with a governmental or administrative agency such as the DFEH or the Labor Board; and
  7. Lastly, an employee is not at will if that employee has an employment contract designating a specific period of time.
Bookmark and Share
September 2, 2009

I'm Pregnant and Afraid to Tell My Boss!!

California law prohibits employers with at least five or more employees from discriminating against an employee on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth or pregnancy-related medical condition.

The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) generally provides that an employee who is disabled on account of pregnancy is entitled to up to four months of leave from work. All time off needed for routine prenatal care, such as doctor's visits, as well as, time off for medically-ordered bed rest, severe morning sickness, childbirth, recovery from childbirth or other pregnancy-related condition may be counted against the leave time. Furthermore, if the employee does not exceed the leave time, she is guaranteed the right to return to work at the same position or a comparable position.

Like any physical disability, an employee disabled on account of pregnancy or a pregnancy-related medical condition has the right to request a medically-advisable reasonable accommodation, such as a request for less strenuous or less hazardous duties. The request needs to be based upon the recommendation of your doctor. Whether the accommodation must be provided is generally based upon whether the accommodation is reasonable and whether the requested accommodation unduly burdens the employer.

Any violation of the rights described above may give rise to a claim of sex (pregnancy) discrimination against your employer.

RELATED RESOURCES

Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)

Bookmark and Share